Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1098214007312630v1
29/1/92    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D'Eon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nation, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Notes

Using Self-Assessments to Detect Workshop Success

Do They Work?

Marcel D'Eon

University of Saskatchewan, marcel.deon{at}usask.ca

Leslie Sadownik

University of British Columbia

Alexandra Harrison

Calgary Health Region

Jill Nation

University of Calgary

An accepted gold standard for measuring change in participant behavior is third-party observation. This method is highly resource intensive, and many small-scale evaluations may not be in a position to use this approach. This study was designed to assess the validity and reliably of aggregated group self-assessments as one way to measure workshop effectiveness. In this study, participants completed a pre-, post-, and retrospective self-assessment on their perceived skill level in delivering feedback. Trained raters scored recorded role-play episodes. A statistically and practically significant difference in feedback skills was detected in both the self-assessments and observer ratings. The instruments used to assess participants' feedback skills had acceptable reliability. Those charged with workshop evaluation should have some confidence that aggregated self-assessments can be used to help determine workshop effectiveness.

Key Words: aggregated self-assessments • workshop evaluation • skill assessment

This version was published on March 1, 2008

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 29, No. 1, 92-98 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1098214007312630
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
D. Moore and C. A. Tananis
Measuring Change in a Short-Term Educational Program Using a Retrospective Pretest Design
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2009; 30(2): 189 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
M. F. D'Eon and K. W. Eva
Self-Assessments for Workshop Evaluations
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2009; 30(2): 259 - 261.
[PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
T. C. M. Lam
Do Self-Assessments Work to Detect Workshop Success?: An Analysis of Argument and Recommendation by D'Eon et al
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2009; 30(1): 93 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]