|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Beyond Use: Understanding Evaluation’s Influence on Attitudes and Actions
Gary T. Henry
Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4039, Atlanta, GA 30302-4039, USA, gthenry{at}gsu.edu
Melvin M. Mark
Although use is a core construct in the field of evaluation, neither the change processes through which evaluation affects attitudes, beliefs, and actions, nor the interim outcomes that lie between the evaluation and its ultimate goal—social betterment—have been sufficiently developed. We draw a number of these change mechanisms, such as justification, persuasion, and policy diffusion, from the social science research literature, and organize them into a framework that has three levels: individual, interpersonal, and collective. We illustrate how these change processes can be linked together to form "pathways" or working hypotheses that link evaluation processes to outcomes that move us along the road toward the goal of social betterment. In addition, we join with Kirkhart (2000) in moving beyond use, to focus our thinking on evaluation influence. Influence, combined with the set of mechanisms and interim outcomes presented here, offers a better way for thinking about, communicating, and adding to the evidence base about the consequences of evaluation and the relationship of evaluation to social betterment.
American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 24, No. 3,
293-314 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/109821400302400302
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
K. Johnson, L. O. Greenseid, S. A. Toal, J. A. King, F. Lawrenz, and B. Volkov
Research on Evaluation Use: A Review of the Empirical Literature From 1986 to 2005
American Journal of Evaluation,
September 1, 2009;
30(3):
377 - 410.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. R. Brandon and J. M. Singh
The Strength of the Methodological Warrants for the Findings of Research on Program Evaluation Use
American Journal of Evaluation,
June 1, 2009;
30(2):
123 - 157.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Balthasar
Institutional Design and Utilization of Evaluation: A Contribution to a Theory of Evaluation Influence Based on Swiss Experience
Eval Rev,
June 1, 2009;
33(3):
226 - 256.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Diaz-Puente, A. C. Montero, and I. de los Rios Carmenado
Empowering communities through evaluation: some lessons from rural Spain
Community Dev. J.,
January 1, 2009;
44(1):
53 - 67.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Diaz-Puente, J. L. Yague, and A. Afonso
Building Evaluation Capacity in Spain: A Case Study of Rural Development and Empowerment in the European Union
Eval Rev,
October 1, 2008;
32(5):
478 - 506.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. T. Jaeger
User-Centered Policy Evaluations of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act: Evaluating E-Government Web Sites for Accessibility for Persons With Disabilities
Journal of Disability Policy Studies,
June 1, 2008;
19(1):
24 - 33.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Lawrenz, A. Gullickson, and S. Toal
Dissemination: Handmaiden to Evaluation Use
American Journal of Evaluation,
September 1, 2007;
28(3):
275 - 289.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Communication Evaluation Expert Panel, J. Abbatangelo-Gray, G. E. Cole, and M. G. Kennedy
Guidance for Evaluating Mass Communication Health Initiatives: Summary of an Expert Panel Discussion Sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Eval Health Prof,
September 1, 2007;
30(3):
229 - 253.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Schwarz and G. Struhkamp
Does Evaluation Build or Destroy Trust?: Insights from Case Studies on Evaluation in Higher Education Reform
Evaluation,
July 1, 2007;
13(3):
323 - 339.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. Christie
Reported Influence of Evaluation Data on Decision Makers' Actions: An Empirical Examination
American Journal of Evaluation,
March 1, 2007;
28(1):
8 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Segerholm and E. Astrom
Governance through Institutionalized Evaluation: Recentralization and Influences at Local Levels in Higher Education in Sweden
Evaluation,
January 1, 2007;
13(1):
48 - 67.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Balthasar
The Effects of Institutional Design on the Utilization of Evaluation: Evidenced Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
Evaluation,
July 1, 2006;
12(3):
353 - 371.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lehtonen
Deliberative Democracy, Participation, and OECD Peer Reviews of Environmental Policies
American Journal of Evaluation,
June 1, 2006;
27(2):
185 - 200.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Molas-Gallart and A. Davies
Toward Theory-Led Evaluation: The Experience of European Science, Technology, and Innovation Policies
American Journal of Evaluation,
March 1, 2006;
27(1):
64 - 82.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Chatterji
Evidence on "What Works": An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation Designs
Educational Researcher,
June 1, 2005;
34(5):
14 - 24.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lehtonen
OECD Environmental Performance Review Programme: Accountability (f)or Learning?
Evaluation,
April 1, 2005;
11(2):
169 - 188.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. H. Weiss, E. Murphy-Graham, and S. Birkeland
An Alternate Route to Policy Influence: How Evaluations Affect D.A.R.E.
American Journal of Evaluation,
March 1, 2005;
26(1):
12 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. J. Cooksy and V. J. Caracelli
Quality, Context, and Use: Issues in Achieving the Goals of Metaevaluation
American Journal of Evaluation,
March 1, 2005;
26(1):
31 - 42.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Chatterji
Evidence on "What Works": An Argument for Extended-Term Mixed-Method (ETMM) Evaluation Designs
Educational Researcher,
December 1, 2004;
33(9):
3 - 13.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. Cousins
Commentary: Minimizing Evaluation Misuse as Principled Practice
American Journal of Evaluation,
September 1, 2004;
25(3):
391 - 397.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Mark and G. T. Henry
The Mechanisms and Outcomes of Evaluation Influence
Evaluation,
January 1, 2004;
10(1):
35 - 57.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
