This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Perrin, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Effective Use and Misuse of Performance Measurement

30770 Vissec, France, Burt_Perrin{at}Compuserve.com

Performance Measurement(PM) is all range. It is Widely touted as the new way of providing for a focus on the results of public programs. But in the current discussion about PM there is little recognition of previous PM attempts, which failed to live up to their billing. This article identifies fallacies in the logic of PM and provides examples of ways in which PM is routinely misused. As a result, performance measures are frequently irrelevant-or worse. Used in isolation, they invariably reward and encourage the wrong activities and result in less, rather than more, attention to outcome and quality. This article also identifies strategies for effective use of PMs. In particular, it identifies how PMs can be useful for monitoring purposes, for raising questions, and for identifying areas requiring management attention. PMs, by themselves. are not appropriate for assessing outcomes, for determining future directions or for resource allocation. They can, however, be one important component of a comprehensive evaluation strategy.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Benjamin Evaluator's Role in Accountability Relationships: Measurement Technician, Capacity Builder or Risk Manager? Evaluation, July 1, 2008; 14(3): 323 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. B. Nielsen and N. Ejler Improving Performance?: Exploring the Complementarities between Evaluation and Performance Management Evaluation, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 171 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Lonsdale Balancing Independence and Responsiveness: A Practitioner Perspective on the Relationships Shaping Performance Audit Evaluation, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 227 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. G. Shilston One, Two, Three, What Are We Still Counting for? Police Performance Regimes, Public Perceptions of Service Delivery and the Failure of Quantitative Measurement Policing, January 1, 2008; 2(3): 359 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Mayne Challenges and Lessons in Implementing Results-Based Management Evaluation, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 87 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. M. Benjamin and K. Misra Doing Good Work: Implications of Performance Accountability for Practice in the Nonprofit Sector International Journal of Rural Management, October 1, 2006; 2(2): 147 - 162. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lehtonen Deliberative Democracy, Participation, and OECD Peer Reviews of Environmental Policies American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2006; 27(2): 185 - 200. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. De Lancer Julnes Performance Measurement: An Effective Tool for Government Accountability? The Debate Goes On Evaluation, April 1, 2006; 12(2): 219 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lehtonen OECD Environmental Performance Review Programme: Accountability (f)or Learning? Evaluation, April 1, 2005; 11(2): 169 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Sutherland Creating a Culture of Data Use for Continuous Improvement: A Case Study of an Edison Project School American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2004; 25(3): 277 - 293. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Feller Performance Measurement Redux American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2002; 23(4): 435 - 452. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Perrin Commentary: Making Yourself--and Evaluation--Useful American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2001; 22(2): 252 - 259. [PDF]

				D. J. Bernstein Comments on Perrin's "Effective Use and Misuse of Performance Measurement" American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 1999; 20(1): 85 - 93. [PDF]

				J. A. Winston Performance Indicators -- Promises Unmet: A Response to Perrin American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 1999; 20(1): 95 - 99. [PDF]

				B. Perrin Performance Measurement: Does the Reality Match the Rhetoric? A Rejoinder to Bernstein and Winston American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 1999; 20(1): 101 - 111. [PDF]