Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1098214007313742v1
29/1/29    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gandhi, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

The Fairy Godmother—and Her Warts: Making the Dream of Evidence-Based Policy Come True

Carol H. Weiss1*, Erin Murphy-Graham2, Anthony Petrosino3, and Allison G. Gandhi4

1 Harvard Graduate School of Education
2 University of California
3 WestED
4 American Institutes for Research

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Carol_weiss{at}harvard.edu.


  Abstract
Evaluators sometimes wish for a Fairy Godmother who would make decision makers pay attention to evaluation findings when choosing programs to implement. The U.S. Department of Education came close to creating such a Fairy Godmother when it required school districts to choose drug abuse prevention programs only if their effectiveness was supported by "scientific" evidence. The experience showed advantages of such a procedure (e.g., reduction in support for D.A.R.E., which evaluation had found wanting) but also shortcomings (limited and in some cases questionable evaluation evidence in support of other programs). Federal procedures for identifying successful programs appeared biased. In addition, the Fairy Godmother discounted the professional judgment of local educators and did little to improve the fit of programs to local conditions. Nevertheless, giving evaluation more clout is a worthwhile way to increase the rationality of decision making. The authors recommend research on procedures used by other agencies to achieve similar aims.

First published on January 15, 2008, doi:10.1177/1098214007313742

American Journal of Evaluation 2008;29:29.

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eval RevHome page
H. Cho, D. Dion Hallfors, B. J. Iritani, and S. Hartman
The Influence of ''No Child Left Behind'' Legislation on Drug Prevention in U.S. Schools
Eval Rev, October 1, 2009; 33(5): 446 - 463.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
D. M. Gorman and J. C. Huber Jr
The Social Construction of ``Evidence-Based'' Drug Prevention Programs: A Reanalysis of Data From the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) Program
Eval Rev, August 1, 2009; 33(4): 396 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]