|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Role Sharing Between Evaluators and Stakeholders in Practice
Jenifer Cartland
Children's Memorial Research Center, Chicago, jcartland{at}childrensmemorial.org
Holly S. Ruch-Ross
Children's Memorial Research Center, Chicago
Maryann Mason
Children's Memorial Research Center, Chicago
William Donohue
Michigan State University
In the past three decades, program evaluation has sought to more fully engage stakeholders in the evaluative process. But little information has been gathered from stakeholders about how they share in evaluation tasks and whether role sharing leads to confusion or tensions between the evaluator and the stakeholders. This article reports findings from surveys and interviews with 20 evaluator—project director (lead stakeholder) pairs to explore how they share each other's roles in practice. In this study, sharing roles between evaluators and project directors generally was the norm among study participants but varied by the orientation of the evaluator (academic, program, or client). For some, there was tension and confusion in the role sharing of evaluators and stakeholders, but it was typically resolved early on in the cases where evaluators bring strong communication skills to the project. Where these skills were not present, the tensions did not resolve consistently.
Key Words: collaborative evaluation • developmental evaluation • and community-based evaluation
References
- Bryk, A. (Ed.). (1983). Stakeholder-based evaluation (Vol. 17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Christie, C.A. (2003). What guides evaluation? A study of how evaluation practice maps onto evaluation theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 97, 7-35.
- Cousins, J.B. (2001). Do evaluator and program practitioner perspectives converge in collaborative evaluation? Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(2), 113-133.
- Cousins, J. B. (Ed.). (2007). Process use in theory, research and practice [Special issue]. New Directions for Evaluation, 116.
- Cousins, J.B., Donohue, J.J., & Bloom, G.A. (1996). Collaborative evaluation in North America: Evaluators' self-reported opinions, practices, and consequences. American Journal of Evaluation, 17(3), 207-226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cousins, J.B., & Earl, L. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397-418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, A., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Finne, H., Levin, M., & Nilssen, T. (1995). Trailing research: A model for useful program evaluation. Evaluation, 1(1), 11-31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ghere, G., King, J.A., Stevahn, L., & Minnema, J. (2006). A professional development unit for reflecting on program evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(1), 108-123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Henry, G.T., & Mark, M.M. (2003). Toward an agenda for research on evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 97, 69-80.[CrossRef]
- Lincoln, Y.S. (1991). The arts and sciences of program evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 12(1), 1-7.[CrossRef]
- Patton, M.Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 311-320.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Patton, M.Q. (1998). The challenges of diversity in evaluation: Narrow versus expansive perspectives. Science Communication, 20(1), 148-164.[Abstract]
- Rothman, K.J. (1990). No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology, 1(1), 43-46.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Leviton, L.C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Shadish, W.R., & Epstein, R. (1987). Patterns of program evaluation practice among members of the Evaluation Research Society and Evaluation Network. Evaluation Review, 11(5), 555-590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Smith, N.L. (1983). Citizen involvement in evaluation: Empirical studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 9, 105-117.[CrossRef]
- Tabachnick, B.G. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 29, No. 4,
460-477 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1098214008326201
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
B. J. Regeer, A.-C. Hoes, M. van Amstel-van Saane, F. F. Caron-Flinterman, and J. F. G. Bunders
Six Guiding Principles for Evaluating Mode-2 Strategies for Sustainable Development
American Journal of Evaluation,
December 1, 2009;
30(4):
515 - 537.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. Skolits, J. A. Morrow, and E. M. Burr
Reconceptualizing Evaluator Roles
American Journal of Evaluation,
September 1, 2009;
30(3):
275 - 295.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
