This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Miller, R. L. Articles by Campbell, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Taking Stock of Empowerment Evaluation

An Empirical Review

Michigan State University, mill1493{at}msu.edu

Rebecca Campbell

Michigan State University

Empowerment evaluation entered the evaluation lexicon in 1993. Since that time, it has attracted many adherents, as well as vocal detractors. A prominent issue in the debates on empowerment evaluation concerns the extent to which empowerment evaluation can be readily distinguished from other approaches to evaluation that share with it an emphasis on participatory and collaborative processes, capacity development, and evaluation use. A second issue concerns the extent to which empowerment evaluation actually leads to empowered outcomes for those who have participated in the evaluation process and those who are the intended beneficiaries of the social programs that were the objects of evaluation. The authors systematically examined 47 case examples of empowerment evaluation published from 1994 through June 2005. The results suggest wide variation among practitioners in adherence to empowerment evaluation principles and weak emphasis on the attainment of empowered outcomes for program beneficiaries. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Key Words: empowerment evaluation • research review • participatory evaluation

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 27, No. 3, 296-319 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/109821400602700303


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Plottu and E. Plottu Approaches to Participation in Evaluation: Some Conditions for Implementation Evaluation, July 1, 2009; 15(3): 343 - 359. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Gibbs, S. R. Hawkins, A. M. Clinton-Sherrod, and R. K. Noonan Empowering Programs With Evaluation Technical Assistance: Outcomes and Lessons Learned Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2009; 10(1_suppl): 38S - 44S. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Campbell, A. E. Adams, and D. Patterson Methodological Challenges of Collecting Evaluation Data From Traumatized Clients/Consumers: A Comparison of Three Methods American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 369 - 381. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. J. Skolits and J. A. Boser Using an Evaluation Hotline to Promote Stakeholder Involvement American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2008; 29(1): 58 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Lin Miller and R. Campbell Taking Stock Again Results in the Same Conclusions: A Reply to Fetterman and Wandersman's Defense of Empowerment Evaluation American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2007; 28(4): 579 - 581. [PDF]

				N. L. Smith Empowerment Evaluation as Evaluation Ideology American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2007; 28(2): 169 - 178. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Fetterman and A. Wandersman Empowerment Evaluation: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2007; 28(2): 179 - 198. [Abstract] [PDF]