American Journal of Evaluation

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

EEPA Call for Papers

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iriti, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 26, No. 4, 464-479 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1098214005281444

Using Recommendations in Evaluation

A Decision-Making Framework for Evaluators

Jennifer E. Iriti

University of Pittsburgh, jeniriti{at}yahoo.com

William E. Bickel

University of Pittsburgh

Catherine Awsumb Nelson

Pittsburgh, PA

Is it appropriate and useful for evaluators to use findings to make recommendations? If so, under what circumstances? How specific should they be? This article presents a decision-making framework for the appropriateness of recommendations in varying contexts. On the basis of reviews of evaluation theory, selected evaluation reports, and feedback from American Evaluation Association presentations, the authors present a description of contextual variables likely to affect the making of recommendations (e.g., use context, evaluator role) and a typology of potential recommendations. To enhance the utility of the tools presented, the authors summarize the available literature and present key arguments for and against the provision of various types of recommendations in given contexts. This work is designed to be a step toward creating a more systematic process for considering the use of recommendations by providing evaluators with a comprehensive tool for reflection and decision making.

Key Words: recommendations • typology • role of evaluator • evaluator decision making • evaluation use


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?