This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bollen, K. Articles by Morishima, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Assessing International Evaluations

An Example From USAID’s Democracy and Governance Program

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, bollen{at}unc.edu

Pamela Paxton

Ohio State University

Rumi Morishima

Ohio State University

Each year, hundreds of millions of dollars are spent in international and bilateral aid programs to assist developing countries in expanding democratic governance. Evaluating these efforts’ effectiveness is important given the vast needs of the client population. This article reviews a sample of evaluations of the United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID) democracy and governance (DG) programming. The authors devise a standardized template to assess the quality of evaluations and find that the evaluations commissioned by USAID need major improvement. They find a lack of methodological accuracy and inadequate coverage of important information about the impact of assistance interventions. Given the importance of the substantive issue, high-quality evaluations are needed to provide reliable information for future programs and policies. The authors consider obstacles to obtaining high-quality international evaluations and provide recommendations for improvements. Although their focus is USAID’s DG programming, much of the authors’ discussion could apply to other assessments of international and domestic evaluations.

Key Words: democracy • governance • USAID • international evaluations

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?