Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnette, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wallis, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Notes

The Missing Treatment Design Element

Continuity of Treatment When Multiple Postobservations Are Used in Time-Series and Repeated Measures Study Designs

J. Jackson Barnette

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Barnette{at}uab.edu

Anne Baber Wallis

University of Iowa

We rely a great deal on the schematic descriptions that represent experimental and quasi-experimental design arrangements, as well as the discussions of threats to validity associated with these, provided by Campbell and his associates: Stanley, Cook, and Shadish. Some of these designs include descriptions of treatments removed, removed and then reintroduced, or reversed with use of multiple postobservations. The focus of this article is to consider what happens to the intervention between and among postobservations and how that relates to threats to validity and data modeling and analysis. Evaluation designs must consider such questions as "Has the intervention been removed, or is it still in place? If so, has it changed in intensity, or are there persistence or carryover effects?" This article adds to the evaluation methodology literature by filling a gap regarding the issue of treatment or intervention continuity between and among postobservations.

Key Words: research design • validity threats • treatment continuity • design notation • time series

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 26, No. 1, 106-123 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1098214004273253


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?