Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitzpatrick, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Exemplars as Case Studies: Reflections on the Links Between Theory, Practice, and Context

Jody L. Fitzpatrick

Graduate School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO 80907, USA, jfitzpat{at}carbon.cudenver.edu

Responding to the call for more research on the practice of evaluation and its link to theory, this article uses the interviews conducted with exemplary evaluators or exemplars in the American Journal of Evaluation as cases to describe and analyze the practice of exemplary evaluators. Dimensions of analysis included context, purpose, advance organizers, breadth and depth of stakeholder involvement, method proclivity, and use of results. Results showed that on these cases, evaluators differed on purpose, advance organizers, and choices on breadth or depth of stakeholder involvement. Determining merit and worth was a frequent and primary purpose for many. All used mixed methods, but varied in the confidence they placed in different methods. Instrumental use was identified in each evaluation. Some evaluators’ practice was congruent with theories; others were more atheoretical. Differences were often nuanced, influenced by both context and evaluator proclivity.

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 25, No. 4, 541-559 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/109821400402500409
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
C. Tourmen
Evaluators' Decision Making: The Relationship Between Theory, Practice, and Experience
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2009; 30(1): 7 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
H. Preskill and S. I. Donaldson
Improving the Evidence Base for Career Development Programs: Making Use of the Evaluation Profession and Positive Psychology Movement
Advances in Developing Human Resources, February 1, 2008; 10(1): 104 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]