Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trevisan, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Practical Training in Evaluation: A Review of the Literature

Michael S. Trevisan

Washington State University, P.O. Box 642136, Pullman, WA 99164-2136, USA, trevisan{at}mail.wsu.edu

This paper provides the results of a literature review on the use of practical, hands-on training experiences in evaluation course work and training programs. The review spans the years 1965-2003. I identified 18 articles that encompass four basic approaches for practical evaluation training: simulation, role-play, single course projects, and practicum experiences. The articles are summarized, documenting strengths, challenges, and unique features for each strategy. Findings from this review indicate substantial resources are often needed for effective practical training experiences. Authors of articles in this review illustrate a variety of options for incorporating methodology and or evaluation theory into the training experiences. The few articles that adhere to a pedagogical framework employ learning models that are consonant with the adult education literature and structure the practical experience accordingly. The literature reveals a lack of formal research on practical evaluation training. Faculty and students consistently speak to the benefits of these training experiences.

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 25, No. 2, 255-272 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/109821400402500212


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. T. Nadler and N. L. Cundiff
Applied Research Consultants (ARC): A Vertical Practicum Model of Training Applied Research
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2009; 30(4): 592 - 602.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
C. Tourmen
Evaluators' Decision Making: The Relationship Between Theory, Practice, and Experience
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2009; 30(1): 7 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
M. A. Kelly and D. Kaczynski
Teaching Evaluation From an Experiential Framework: Connecting Theory and Organizational Development With Grant Making
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2008; 29(4): 547 - 554.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. D. Dewey, B. E. Montrosse, D. C. Schroter, C. D. Sullins, and J. R. Mattox II
Evaluator Competencies: What's Taught Versus What's Sought
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 268 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
D. E. Oliver, A. M. Casiraghi, J. L. Henderson, A. M. Brooks, and M. Mulsow
Teaching Program Evaluation Three Selected Pillars of Pedagogy
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 330 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
L. J. Cooksy
Challenges and Opportunities in Experiential Learning
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 340 - 342.
[PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. Lee, T. LeBaron Wallace, and M. Alkin
Using Problem-Based Learning to Train Evaluators
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2007; 28(4): 536 - 545.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
K. Febey and M. Coyne
Program Evaluation: The Board Game: An Interactive Learning Tool for Evaluators
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2007; 28(1): 91 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
M. V. Davis
Teaching Practical Public Health Evaluation Methods
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2006; 27(2): 247 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
S. Ross and R. Hopson
Book Review: Building Evaluation Capacity: 72 Activities for Teaching and Training
American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2006; 27(1): 124 - 127.
[PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
C. Hurley, R. Renger, and B. Brunk
Learning From a Challenging Fieldwork Evaluation Experience: Perspectives of a Student and an Instructor
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2005; 26(4): 562 - 578.
[Abstract] [PDF]