This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gordon, R. A. Articles by Heinrich, C. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Modeling Trajectories in Social Program Outcomes for Performance Accountability

Department of Sociology and Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, 815 W. Van Buren Street, Suite 525, Chicago, IL 60607, USA, ragordon{at}uic.edu

Carolyn J. Heinrich

Government and public focus on accountability for program outcomes, combined with practical and ethical constraints on experimental designs, make nonexperimental studies of social programs an increasingly common approach to producing information on program performance. In this paper, we compare the effectiveness of alternative nonexperimental evaluation methods used with longitudinal data to produce information about social program outcomes. The analysis is applied in an evaluation of a demonstration program designed to help young parents and their partners make the transition from receiving public transfer income to earned income. Empirical findings indicate that modeling outcome trajectories using multilevel methods generates more complete information about the nature of the program effects, relative to standard econometric alternatives as commonly applied in evaluations. With increased access to sources of administrative and management information system data covering multiple time points, we urge researchers to help social policy and program decision-makers appropriately model and produce more accurate information on program outcomes.

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 25, No. 2, 161-189 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/109821400402500203


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. T. Jaeger User-Centered Policy Evaluations of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act: Evaluating E-Government Web Sites for Accessibility for Persons With Disabilities Journal of Disability Policy Studies, June 1, 2008; 19(1): 24 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]