Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Evaluation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barth, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Low-Cost, Post Hoc Method to Rate Overall Site Quality in a Multi-Site Demonstration

Michael C. Barth

ICF Consulting, 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031, USA, mbarth{at}icfconsulting.com

Demonstration programs and social experiments are often subject to sophisticated, controlled evaluations. An important factor that is not subject to control, and sometimes even goes unobserved, is overall program site quality. Site quality can be observed in process evaluations, but these tend to be expensive. This paper describes an alternative approach to site quality measurement. With observations elicited from national program staff of a large demonstration project, we developed an approach that uses Concept Mapping to identify dimensions for rating program site quality and compared our results with ratings based on site visits developed during program implementation. The site quality ratings and rankings resulting from our approach are plausible, have desirable psychometric properties, and are developed at much lower cost than is possible for even relatively modest process analyses.

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 25, No. 1, 79-97 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/109821400402500106
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
S. R. Rosas
Concept Mapping as a Technique for Program Theory Development: An Illustration Using Family Support Programs
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2005; 26(3): 389 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]