This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gajda, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Utilizing Collaboration Theory to Evaluate Strategic Alliances

The University of Vermont, 409C Waterman Building, 85 S. Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05405-0160, USA, Rebecca.Gajda{at}uvm.edu

Increasingly, collaboration between business, non-profit, health and educational agencies is being championed as a powerful strategy to achieve a vision otherwise not possible when independent entities work alone. But the definition of collaboration is elusive and it is often difficult for organizations to put collaboration into practice and assess it with certainty. Program evaluators can assist practitioners concerned with the development of a strategic alliance predicated on collaboration by understanding and utilizing principles of collaboration theory. The Strategic Alliance Formative Assessment Rubric (SAFAR) is an assessment tool that captures central principles of collaboration and has been used as part of a four-step evaluation process to help alliance leaders, managers, and members in Safe School/Healthy Student Initiatives to quantitatively and qualitatively gauge, celebrate, and communicate the relative strength of their collaborative endeavor over time. The collaboration principles and corresponding assessment processes described in this article can be used by evaluators of large- or small-scale initiatives that seek to capitalize on the synergistic power of the "collaborative effort."

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 25, No. 1, 65-77 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/109821400402500105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. R. Majumdar, C. Moynihan, and J. Pierce Public Collaboration in Transportation: A Case Study Public Works Management Policy, July 1, 2009; 14(1): 55 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Daley Interdisciplinary Problems and Agency Boundaries: Exploring Effective Cross-Agency Collaboration J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2009; 19(3): 477 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. Goldman and K. J. Schmalz Being Well-Connected: Starting and Maintaining Successful Partnerships Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2008; 9(1): 5 - 8. [PDF]

				R. Gajda and C. Koliba Evaluating the Imperative of Intraorganizational Collaboration: A School Improvement Perspective American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2007; 28(1): 26 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. B. Frey, J. H. Lohmeier, S. W. Lee, and N. Tollefson Measuring Collaboration Among Grant Partners American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2006; 27(3): 383 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]