This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Friedman, V. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Designed Blindness: An Action Science Perspective on Program Theory Evaluation

Department of Behavioral Sciences, Ruppin Institute, Emek Hefer 40250, Israel, victorf{at}ruppin.ac.il

This article is intended to stimulate a dialogue between program theory evaluation and action science for the purposes of cross-fertilization and mutual enrichment. Both program theory evaluation and action science use the concept of implicit "theories of action" as a central construct in the study of social practice. However, an action science approach suggests a wider understanding of program theory that (1) specifies the links between individual reasoning and behavior to program implementation, and (2) accounts for how programs deal with dilemmas, conflict, and error. This paper begins with a systematic, though not exhaustive, comparison of program theory evaluation and action science. It analyzes an exemplar of program theory evaluation from an action science perspective to illustrate a subtheory, "designed blindness," and its impact on both program implementation and the evaluation itself. It then offers a theory for overcoming designed blindness. Finally, this article argues that action science concepts and skills can enable program theory evaluators to be more effective in confronting defensiveness and in facilitating learning among stakeholders when there is a gap between "espoused" program theory and "theory-in-use."

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. L. Leeuw and J.-E. Furubo Evaluation Systems: What Are They and Why Study Them? Evaluation, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 157 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. J. Friedman, J. Rothman, and B. Withers The Power of Why: Engaging the Goal Paradox in Program Evaluation American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2006; 27(2): 201 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Friedman, M. Razer, and I. Sykes Towards a Theory of Inclusive Practice: An Action Science Approach Action Research, June 1, 2004; 2(2): 167 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. J. Friedman Extended Review Management Learning, December 1, 2002; 33(4): 525 - 530. [PDF]