This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Worthen, B. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Critical Challenges Confronting Certification of Evaluators

Western Institute for Research and Evaluation 1245 No. 1750 E., Psychology Department, Utah State University, 2810 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-2810, blaine{at}coe.usu.edu

There are many clear-cut reasons why it would be desirable to have a certification process for evaluators, both to help improve the practice of evaluation and to further the field’s maturation into a full-fledged profession. But there are also many strong arguments against attempting to launch an evaluator certification system, at least at this time. The arguments for and against AEA attempting to set up an evaluator certification system are discussed, including two contextual changes that have led to a significant shift in my thinking on this topic over the last three decades. Also presented are four major challenges that would need to be overcome in any effort to develop a viable evaluator certification system. In light of these challenges, I argue that the development and implementation of a certification process can succeed only if pursued patiently and incrementally, with adequate time for AEA to test the feasibility of each of the definitional and procedural processes that would need to undergird such a system. Finally, an agenda of steps is suggested that AEA might take to determine if our field and our collective wisdom have matured sufficiently for us to succeed in such an important undertaking.

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 20, No. 3, 533-555 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/109821409902000312


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Dewey, B. E. Montrosse, D. C. Schroter, C. D. Sullins, and J. R. Mattox II Evaluator Competencies: What's Taught Versus What's Sought American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 268 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Ghere, J. A. King, L. Stevahn, and J. Minnema A Professional Development Unit for Reflecting on Program Evaluator Competencies American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2006; 27(1): 108 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Worthen Whither Evaluation? That All Depends American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2001; 22(3): 409 - 418. [PDF]

				M. M. Mark From the Editor American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2001; 22(2): ix - x. [PDF]

				J. A. King, L. Stevahn, G. Ghere, and J. Minnema Toward a Taxonomy of Essential Evaluator Competencies American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2001; 22(2): 229 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Trevisan The Status of Program Evaluation Expectations in State School Counselor Certification Requirements American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2000; 21(1): 81 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]