This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, M. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Should AEA Begin a Process for Restricting Membership in the Profession of Evaluation?

College of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Maryland, 2115 Symons Hall, College Park, MD 20742, ms74{at}umail.umd.edu

In this paper I present an argument supporting the position that AEA should not undertake a certification or similar process at the present time, even though I believe the public needs some type of protection from unscrupulous and incompetent evaluators. The problems a certification process would solve have not been substantiated; the public may not support such an endeavor; "evaluation" is not clearly defined, which means the knowledge and skills (K/S) unique to its practice and performance criteria are not agreed upon; and the process for putting a certification system into place is a very complex and costly undertaking (e.g., ensuring the accuracy and integrity of determining who does and does not have the requisite K/S and who is applying them in an effective manner). In addition, certification would require establishing some way to decertify incompetent practitioners, and being able to defend all of these actions when there is disagreement and even litigation. I believe that AEA is not likely to be able to do these things in an effective manner, in the near future.

American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 20, No. 3, 521-531 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/109821409902000311


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Dewey, B. E. Montrosse, D. C. Schroter, C. D. Sullins, and J. R. Mattox II Evaluator Competencies: What's Taught Versus What's Sought American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2008; 29(3): 268 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Ghere, J. A. King, L. Stevahn, and J. Minnema A Professional Development Unit for Reflecting on Program Evaluator Competencies American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2006; 27(1): 108 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Stevahn, J. A. King, G. Ghere, and J. Minnema Establishing Essential Competencies for Program Evaluators American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2005; 26(1): 43 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. Mark From the Editor American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2001; 22(2): ix - x. [PDF]

				J. A. King, L. Stevahn, G. Ghere, and J. Minnema Toward a Taxonomy of Essential Evaluator Competencies American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2001; 22(2): 229 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Worthen Critical Challenges Confronting Certification of Evaluators American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 1999; 20(3): 533 - 555. [Abstract] [PDF]